Portfolio/HomeMate

CASE STUDY

HomeMate — Designing Confidence in the Rental Journey

A conceptual product design project exploring how renters can search, compare, and book property viewings with greater confidence and less decision fatigue.

User ResearchJourney MappingInformation ArchitectureUsability TestingMobile UX
HomeMate — real estate platform UI

Project Overview

Project

HomeMate — Real Estate Rental Platform

Type

Mobile-First Product Design & UX Research

Role

Product Designer & UX Researcher

Timeline

6 months

Scope

End-to-end platform design: Search & Discovery → Listing Detail → Saved Homes → Booking Flow → Renter Dashboard

Deliverables

User Research · Journey Mapping · Information Architecture · Wireframes · Prototype · High-Fidelity UI · Usability Testing

Overview

Finding a home in the UK is often stressful, time-consuming, and emotionally draining for both renters and buyers. Existing property platforms frequently overwhelm users with outdated listings, inconsistent information, and a lack of transparency — making the search harder than it needs to be.

HomeMate was created to redefine this experience.

This project explores how a digital platform can simplify the home-hunting journey through clarity, organization, and meaningful insight. HomeMate empowers users to find a home that fits their lifestyle, priorities, and long-term needs — not just their budget.

Problem Statement

Problem Statement

People struggle to make confident housing decisions because:

  • Listings are outdated or unavailable

  • Costs and contract terms lack clarity

  • Neighborhood information is limited or missing

As a result, users waste time, miss opportunities, and feel overwhelmed during a process that should feel exciting — not exhausting.

Research

Understanding the Rental Search Experience

Having moved homes multiple times myself — and witnessing friends go through the same — I understood how overwhelming the process can be. To gain deeper insight, I explored how people search for homes, what they prioritize, and where friction occurs.

Research methods included:

1

Interviews with renters and buyers in London

2

Observation of how users browse listings, shortlist properties, and schedule viewings

3

Competitive analysis of major UK property platforms (Zoopla, Rightmove, OnTheMarket)

4

Surveys conducted with friends and family across the UK

Key Finding

44.8%of respondents reported difficulty finding the information they needed on property platforms.

This confirmed the lack of transparency and clarity as a core usability problem.

User Quotes

"

It's exhausting trying to organize viewings and keep track of all the details — I feel rushed to decide or offer more money just to secure a place.

— Daniela

UX Insight

Users experience cognitive overload during the viewing and comparison process, creating stress and rushed decision-making.

"

I hate finding a good property and then having to fill out forms and wait forever for a reply — I just want to contact the owner directly.

— Laura

UX Insight

Slow communication flows and fragmented application steps create friction and reduce trust in the platform experience.

"

It's frustrating when listings are outdated or missing key details — I waste time checking properties that don't even exist anymore.

— Leonel

UX Insight

Users need clearer listing transparency, better information accuracy, and stronger availability indicators.

DISCOVERY

Defining the Opportunity

Target User

A typical HomeMate user is a busy professional relocating for work who needs to make fast, confident decisions. They want reliable information, real-time availability, and clear property details — all in one place.

User Needs & Why They Matter

Research Insights

12User Interviews
3Journey Maps
18Survey Responses
4Usability Tests
01

Real-time availability signals

Users abandon searches when listings feel stale or unconfirmed

02

Remote-first property evaluation

Most decisions begin long before any in-person visit

03

Neighborhood context, not just location

Proximity data alone doesn't answer 'will I feel at home here?'

04

Guided scheduling, not more steps

Cognitive overload peaks at the booking and viewing stage

05

Verified details and contract clarity

Trust erodes quickly when information feels incomplete or inconsistent

06

Persistent organisation across the search

Users manage multiple properties at once and need structure to stay confident

Research revealed that renters value clarity, trust, and decision confidence above listing volume. Reducing uncertainty at key decision points mattered more than adding more features.

Design Principles

Guiding the Experience

With user needs mapped, I defined five principles to guide feature prioritization, interaction patterns, and the overall product tone.

Reduce Uncertainty

01

Most drop-off came from uncertainty, not missing features. Each screen was designed to answer the user's most important question immediately.

Guided Exploration

02

Users move through distinct decision phases. The experience progressively reveals deeper information only when needed.

Transparent Interactions

03

Trust breaks when key details are hidden. Availability, costs, and contract information are surfaced early to support informed decisions.

Mobile-First Exploration

04

Users often search while commuting, relocating, or multitasking throughout the day. The experience was designed to support fast, focused decision-making in mobile-first contexts without overwhelming the user.

Insight-Driven Decisions

05

Data alone doesn't build confidence — context does. Neighborhood insights, verified reviews, and comparison tools support clearer decisions.

These principles transformed research insights into practical interaction patterns — guiding every persona-driven design decision that followed.

User Personas

Who We Designed For

With design principles established, I developed two representative personas from research — each shaped by distinct goals, frustrations, and decision-making patterns.

Felipe Salazar
Motivated Professional

Felipe Salazar

"I don't have time to chase agents or second-guess listings. I need to know a place is available, trustworthy, and right for me — before I even book a viewing."

Key Behaviours

  • Seeks reliable, remote-first property evaluation

  • Values neighbourhood context and lifestyle fit

  • Frustrated by slow, inconsistent agent communication

Lauren Bennett
Budget-Conscious Renter

Lauren Bennett

"I just want to know exactly what I'm paying, who I'm dealing with, and that the place actually exists. The process feels designed to confuse you."

Key Behaviours

  • Time-constrained — needs fast, confident decisions

  • Values cost transparency above all other factors

  • Mobile-first browsing across multiple platforms

User Journey

Understanding the Decision Journey

To better understand the emotional experience of moving homes, I mapped the end-to-end renter journey and analyzed where friction, uncertainty, and cognitive overload appeared most frequently.

Customer Journey Map — Finding a property to rent
Expand

Customer Journey Map — end-to-end renter experience, emotional arc, and design opportunities

What the Journey Revealed

Emotional highs and lows

Users began the property search feeling optimistic, but confidence gradually declined as uncertainty and information gaps increased throughout the journey.

Trust breakdowns

Incomplete property information, inconsistent listing details, and limited transparency reduced trust during key decision-making moments.

Moments of decision fatigue

Comparing multiple properties, coordinating viewings, and managing conversations across agents created cognitive overload.

Opportunities to simplify the experience

Users needed better property context, streamlined scheduling, and centralized communication to reduce friction and improve confidence.

The journey map revealed three critical friction points: lack of trust in listing information, cognitive overload during property comparison, and fragmented communication throughout the viewing process. These insights directly informed the opportunity areas explored in the next phase of the design.

From Research to Strategy

Three strategic themes emerged directly from the journey map — each one pointing to a clear product direction.

Strategic Opportunities

Three themes shaped the product direction

01

Trust & Transparency

Listings felt stale and unverified. Trust needed to be visible — through real-time availability, verified photos, and clear costs — before a user makes an inquiry.

Real-time availabilityVerified visualsTransparent pricing
02

Discovery & Decision Confidence

Users lacked context, not listings. Neighborhood atmosphere and lifestyle fit were missing — forcing external research to answer basic questions.

Neighborhood insightsLifestyle filteringComparative views
03

Coordination & Scheduling

The post-shortlist experience is where trust broke down most. Users needed one place to book viewings, track properties, and communicate directly.

Smart schedulingSaved listingsDirect messaging

Constraints & Considerations

What shapes the solution space

01

Real-time data access requires partnerships with portals (e.g., Zoopla, Rightmove).

02

Verifying listings and reviews introduces operational cost and moderation needs.

03

GDPR compliance is essential for user profiles and direct communications.

04

Neighborhood and cost data depends on reliable third-party APIs.

05

Real-time notifications require robust backend infrastructure.

These constraints shaped feature scoping — prioritizing decisions that deliver the highest confidence gains within realistic boundaries.

Experience Strategy

Designing the Search-to-Decision Flow

After identifying key user frustrations, I mapped the complete rental journey to understand how users search, evaluate, compare, and decide on properties. The flow was designed to reduce friction, improve clarity, and support confident decision-making across multiple user paths.

Reduce Friction

Simplify discovery with guided filtering and streamlined actions.

Improve Trust

Verified details, transparent info, and clear communication touchpoints.

Support Decisions

Help users compare properties and evaluate options efficiently.

Return Engagement

Saved searches and notifications keep users connected throughout.

HomeMate — User Flow Decision Journey Map

User flow diagram — complete rental decision journey from discovery to commitment.

Project Planning

Plan Development

To manage scope across an 8-week timeline, I mapped the project into five phases: Wireframing, Stretch Goals, Hi-Fi Prototype, Testing, and Dev Hand-off.

Each task was assigned to a screen, typed as Core or UX/UI, estimated in hours, and tracked to a deadline — keeping design decisions intentional and time-boxed from low-fidelity exploration through to hand-off.

Development plan preview
I: Wireframe LoFiI: Stretch GoalsII: Prototype HiFiIII: Test PrototypeV: Dev Hand-off

5 Phases · 20+ Tasks · 8-Week Timeline

Full planning spreadsheet with status tracking

View Full Development Plan ↗

Validation

Turning User Feedback Into Design Decisions

I conducted moderated usability testing using a high-fidelity prototype focused on the Richmond, UK market — evaluating navigation, content hierarchy, interaction patterns, and user confidence across the property search journey.

Key Usability Findings

Participants had 5–10 seconds to explore the homepage before completing tasks — assessing whether HomeMate's purpose was immediately clear and whether the interface felt trustworthy at first glance.

Participants completed property-search tasks while thinking aloud — revealing recurring friction points that directly informed the next design iteration.

Participant interacting with the HomeMate prototypeProperty Exploration
Wider view of the moderated usability testing sessionNavigation

Moderated usability testing session using the Richmond prototype.

Core Tasks

Participants completed six representative tasks:

1

Search for a property

2

Browse and open listings

3

Adjust filters, including the price range slider

4

Sort and save properties

5

Share a listing and access the inbox

6

Navigate freely between key sections

These tasks were designed to validate assumptions around discoverability, content hierarchy, filtering, saved properties, and navigation.

Design Improvements

Connecting Feedback to Design Decisions

01

Improving Interaction Clarity

Implemented

Finding

Users struggled with the draggable slide-up interaction and were unsure how to activate it.

Design Response

  • Improved gesture discoverability

  • Added visual interaction cues

  • Reduced friction during onboarding

02

Making Filters Easier to Understand

In Progress

Finding

Users had difficulty locating and understanding the price range controls.

Design Response

  • Added clearer price range labeling

  • Introduced helper text

  • Improved filter hierarchy and visibility

03

Creating a More Immersive Property Experience

Planned

Finding

Users wanted richer ways to explore properties before booking a viewing.

Design Response

  • Added video tours

  • Prioritized high-quality imagery

  • Planned support for more immersive property previews

Outcome

Usability testing validated the core property-search flow while uncovering opportunities to improve gesture discoverability, filter clarity, and property exploration. These insights directly informed the next design iteration, ensuring design decisions were grounded in observed user behavior rather than assumptions.

Visual Foundation

Building a Cohesive Design System

To create a unified product language, I established the HomeMate Design Foundation. This system brought together typography, color, imagery, logo standards, and reusable UI components to ensure consistency, scalability, and efficiency across the entire product experience.

FINAL EXPERIENCE

Bringing the Experience to Life

Research insights, usability findings, and the visual design system came together to shape the final HomeMate experience.

Prototype Highlights

  • Location-first property search

  • Streamlined filtering and discovery

  • Interactive floor plan navigation

  • Immersive 3D property walkthroughs

  • Focused home tour booking flow

The prototype below demonstrates how these decisions work together to help renters discover, evaluate, and schedule tours with confidence.

Key Learnings & Design Impact

Key Takeaway

Confidence is the outcome of good decision-making support.

Throughout the project, the goal was never to help users browse more properties — it was to help them make better decisions with less uncertainty. Every design decision, from location-first search to immersive property exploration, focused on giving renters the context and clarity needed to move forward with confidence.

Learnings

Users think about location before property details.

Prioritizing location-first search aligned the experience with users' natural decision-making process and reduced friction at the start of the journey.

Complexity should be revealed progressively.

Advanced filters became more useful when organized into clear, digestible groups that supported decision-making without overwhelming users.

Visual context reduces uncertainty.

Floor plans and 3D walkthroughs helped users build accurate mental models of a property before committing to a viewing.

High-intent moments require focus.

Streamlining the tour booking flow removed unnecessary distractions and made scheduling feel faster and more intuitive.

Consistency builds trust.

Using familiar patterns across search, exploration, and booking created a predictable experience that helped users feel in control.

This project reinforced the importance of designing beyond individual screens. The most impactful improvements came from connecting research insights, interaction design, and visual systems into a cohesive experience.

By reducing uncertainty at every stage of the journey, HomeMate transformed property search from a task of comparison into a process of confident decision-making.

Interested in working together?